What constitutes "reasonable suspicion" for a security guard?

"Reasonable suspicion" for a security guard is defined as a belief based on specific facts and circumstances that suggest a person is about to commit a crime. This standard requires more than just a vague feeling or intuition; it must be grounded in observable behaviors or specific information that raises concern.

For instance, if a guard notices someone acting suspiciously by loitering around a restricted area and looking around nervously, this observed behavior could contribute to reasonable suspicion. This approach emphasizes the importance of objective facts rather than subjective feelings or assumptions.

The other options lack the requisite foundation for establishing reasonable suspicion. A gut feeling without substantive evidence does not meet the legal threshold. Similarly, making assumptions based solely on a person's appearance or relying on unverified reports from others would not typically constitute reasonable suspicion, as these do not provide the factual basis required to support a belief that a crime is imminent.